Home News Canada B.C. court rejects appeal of man who said Jews should be sterilized

B.C. court rejects appeal of man who said Jews should be sterilized

1755
1
SHARE
Arthur Topham CBC PHOTO

The British Columbia Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of a Quesnel, B.C., man convicted of promoting hatred against Jewish people in November 2015.

On his website, RadicalPress.com, Arthur Topham wrote that Jews should be forcibly sterilized. He described Canada as being “controlled by the Zionist lobby” and said Jewish synagogues are “synagogues of Satan.”

Harry Abrams, who was the representative for the B’nai Brith Canada’s League for Human Rights in 2007, when he was the first to raise the alarm about Topham’s anti-Semitic writing, said he’d like to see Topham receive the maximum sentence of two years.

READ: ‘RABIDLY ANTI-SEMITIC B.C. MAN CONVICTED OF HATE CRIME

“He was convicted in 2015 by a jury of his peers, and he’s dragged it out, kept everything up on his website since then and added to it over all this time,” said Abrams, who now serves as chair of community relations for the Jewish Federation of Victoria and Vancouver Island.

“It’s all been hateful, deliberate and with the intention of causing maximum pain and fear to Jews. He’s a sick guy and there has to be some kind of backstop on this.”

The Feb. 20 ruling by the B.C. Supreme Court is an important one, said Aidan Fishman, who worked closely with Amanda Hohmann, national director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights, on this case.

“The argument by Topham’s lawyer, Barclay W. Johnson, that the law that criminalizes hate speech in Canada is unconstitutional, had no merit in my opinion,” he said.

“Basically they were arguing that the presence of the Internet, and the fact that information is more widely available because of it, changes whether that material is constitutional or not. The judge firmly rejected that argument. He wrote in his decision that it actually makes the offence even more serious, by virtue of the fact that it’s much easier to disseminate hate today,” Fishman added.

“This also means that when faced with incidents of hate, especially online, police and prosecutors should press charges because there’s no evidence those charges won’t succeed, so there’s no excuse for not enforcing them.”

Abrams speculated Topham might try to appeal this conviction to the B.C. Court of Appeal.

Johnson said he had not received any instructions from his client about an appeal.

He noted that he shared office space with Topham’s former lawyer, Doug Christie, who died in March 2013 after a long career in which he gained notoriety for defending Holocaust deniers such as Ernst Zundel and James Keegstra.

“On his deathbed, I told [Christie] I’d look after the rest of his files, and this was one of them,” Johnson said.

“My interest was piqued by going over the issues related to freedom of expression. Ninety-nine percent of the material Arthur Topham posted from other sources is available on the Internet, so the question is, what do you do about all this wickedness? I don’t think you use the Criminal Code,” he said. “We argued that the protections afforded in Canada are of little assistance if you weigh them against what’s available worldwide.”

Johnson said Topham does not have a criminal record, and he’s hopeful he would not serve time in jail.

But Abrams begged to differ.

“I really think he should spend a couple of years in jail. He’s sadistic and racist, and he’s worked really hard for it.”

Johnson said Topham’s sentencing is scheduled for March 10.

  • Ralph Frank Watzke Llb

    Shalom! A Blessed and Prosperous Passover to all! As a Canadian retired lawyer with a longtime interest in human rights, and a law school classmate of Topham’s counsel, Barclay Johnson, I have been following this case. I find your article, and especially the false “clickbait” headline to be erroneous and misleading. From my reading of the evidence, this elderly man NEVER, EVER advocated sterilization of Jews AT ALL. “His” book, Israel Must Perish, was an exact word-for-word parody of a nasty 1941 book Germany Must Perish, written by U.S. Jewish writer Theodore Kaufman (1911-86), substituting only the names Israel and Jews, for Germany and Germans (!). Yes, Kaufman’s book does exist, I read an original copy in University of Alberta library, and his plan to completely de-industrialize Germany and revert it to solely agriculture, (except for the infamous forced sterilization part), was actually implemented for the most part by the victorious Allies under the genocidal Morgenthau Plan from 1945 to c.1948-49, when the 3 western Allied occupants had a sudden change of heart; the Soviets continued to dismantle and remove factories in their Zone for a further decade. By the way, Arthur Topham has been married for 37 years to his ethnically-Jewish wife Shastah, who stood by her spouse all along his court ordeal; they have several adult “Mischling” children. He certainly can’t accurately be described as “Nazi”, had he lived in the Third Reich, Topham and his family would almost certainly have suffered persecution and likely the death of his wife and children. He would have been guilty of Rassenschande – racial impurity, a huge crime in that regime. My view of Human Rights is for unrestrained freedom of expression and religion for all, not persecuting old men for unpopular beliefs, and certainly not for posting a Jonathan Swift-style parody.