Holocaust ad sparks social media controversy

Holocaust ad sparks social media controversy

2039
7
SHARE
Ad for Yom Hashoah links to a website and human rights groups. Courtesy Anderson DDB.

An advertising campaign, which shows an elderly woman’s arm tattooed with the date of Holocaust Remembrance Day (April 24 this year), has generated some unexpected controversy on social media.

The ad, designed by a woman whose  family survived the Holocaust, ran in the National Post and other daily newspapers across the country on April 21. The print ad carries the logos of the March of the Living and United Israel Appeal of Canada.

The ad and a 30-second video direct viewers to a website, knowmorenow.org, which has links to a number of human rights organizations.

“We came up with this idea of using this visual as a powerful way of communicating the date, so people would remember the date,” said Patty Zoldos, senior writer at the ad agency Anderson DDB.

Zoldos and senior art director Mario Amaral designed the website to “get people talking about the Holocaust” and provide information about other modern genocides.

“We thought it was time for us to do something beyond donating to things,” she said. Zoldos cares for her mother and aunt, both of whom survived Auschwitz. The idea came to her while she was thinking about the rising tide of intolerance and anti-Semitism.

The video and the print ad were produced for free by people who felt strongly about the campaign, said Zoldos. The newspapers also donated the space for the ads.

READ: REMEMBER JEWISH ACTS OF RESISTANCE

However, not everyone has reacted positively to the images and a lively debate has erupted on Facebook about whether iconic Holocaust images should be altered. Musician Joshua Dolgin, also known by his stage name Socalled, said he was shocked when he saw the ad in the newspaper in his parents’ home. He re-posted the ad on Facebook, calling the campaign “patently absurd, truly tone-deaf.” Others joined the discussion, criticizing the photo.

“You don’t need to come up with dramatic images or shocking images about the Holocaust. There’s plenty that came out of the Holocaust to draw on,” said Dolgin, who fuses hip hop, klezmer and other genres in his music. “What’s more shocking than a human being being branded by the Nazis? To think that you need to make it more shocking, there’s no rationale for it that I can see.”

Eli Rubenstein, national director of the March of the Living, said he found the ads “compelling” and “evocative.” More importantly, he said, the survivors he consulted did as well.

Speaking from Warsaw, where he is leading the annual March of the Living, Rubenstein said he showed the proposed ad to Toronto’s March of the Living Committee and to a number of survivors, nearly all of whom were in favour of it.

“Had the survivors not liked it, I wouldn’t have gone with it,” he said.

READ: ELISHA WIESEL URGES JEWS NOT TO BE SILENT

The issue of tattoos is controversial, he said, with some survivors removing them, and others keeping them as “a badge of honour.” And any artistic representation of the Holocaust creates disagreement, he noted.

“There’s nothing we can do in the Jewish community that someone’s not going to object to,” he said. “That’s part of being Jewish.”

Meanwhile, the website has also logged supportive comments, with at least one person sending in a photo of his late father-in-law’s tattooed arm.

Linda Kislowicz, president and CEO of Jewish Federations of Canada-United Israel Appeal, said about the ad, “In a world where anti-Semitism is on the rise, our commitment to preserving the memory of the Holocaust, to educating the next generations through impactful experiences such as March of the Living, and to joining others in their efforts to build awareness and understanding in the wider community is more imperative than ever.”

  • Joshua Dolgin

    So-called Michael Sherman, I don’t know you. Why do you insult me personally? Why do you judge me? All I did was complain about AN OFFENSIVE AD CAMPAIGN, one that I (and many many other people) felt was not appropriate or tasteful or “cute” or innovative: an ad campaign that made me sick to my stomach. HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE is not at issue here: believe it or not, I’m not “classic example” (lol) of a fair-weather self-hating Jew: a simple google search for my name would demonstate that I have dedicated a lot of my life and international career to celebrating, studying, sharing and teaching Jewish culture. It’s THIS BAD AD that’s the issue. Who said anything about downplaying the importance of Holocaust remembrance? You missed the point. Your kneejerk, aggressive, personally offensive response was uncalled for, sir. And this toothless article, which basically just allowed the people who made the terrible ad another platform to offer their half-assed rationale for making something so tone-deaf (yes, I’ll say it again) did nothing to engage with or even offer the possibility of a critique of what I and many others still consider an idiotic ad campaign for an incredibly important memorial event in our community. My quote used here was the first 2 sentences I uttered in a 30 minute interview: hardly the nuanced position that such a complicated situation requires. Rushing to defend this campaign, without considering what it actually presents, and what it means to the public serves noone.

    • Liz Recompsat

      As one of So-Called legion of fans, I concur with the excellent reply above and aso call out poster Michael Sherman for his insulting, personal attack propagating some hateful nastiness based on his own vulgar, false and malicious assumptions regarding So-Called’s motivations.

      So-Called is a national treasure consistently lauded on all four French and English CBC1 and 2 and CBC-FM and ICI-musique radio stations as one of our most precious multi-lingual multi-cultural composer/singer/musicians, who deserves much better than such hateful invective.

      • Michael Sherman

        There are plenty of so-called excellent musicians who try to hide behind their musical credentials but who engage in silly or offensive or insulting political statements. Dolgin gets no exemption regardless of his being in your words “one of our most precious multi-lingual multi-cultural lcomposer/singer/musicians”.

    • Michael Sherman

      “All I did was complain about AN OFFENSIVE AD CAMPAIGN.” Your complaint is offensive and insulting to Jews who view Holocaust remembrance regardless of the format as an important reminder. You and others have chosen to single out the ad for
      condemnation which in and of itself is not only offensive and insulting but moreover it raises an issue which is a non-issue and contributes to the current anti-Semitic environment and draws negative attention to the Jewish community. Nice going Josh!
      Further, your rejoinder is typical of those who complain about being complained about and like to dish it out but can’t take it when being complained about. Your hypocrisy and those who would defend you is breathtaking.

  • Joshua Dolgin

    You won’t print my comment?

    • CJNAdmin

      All comments are subject to approval. We do not have anyone working full time doing this. It’s only been half an hour.

  • Joshua Dolgin

    Great piece!